Updating music library

[Dolce24]

Hello Silverjuke service team.

I don't know if it this already possible:

Is it possibly when you add fx. 10 new albums to the database, that it don't have to run all song through the update procedure, because it takes a long time if you have 25.000+ songs the first time. I know second time if the program is open it goes faster.

It would be nice if it only have to go through the 10 new albums added to library.

Hope you understand my bad english.

Best regards Dolce24

[Service-Team]

Dolce24 wrote:
> It would be nice if it only have to go through the
> 10 new albums added to library.

Well, this happens automatically on a normal update (eg. by pressing "F5") - tags are read only from the new albums/tracks, the old albums/tracks are identified by the file date and are not touched in the database. As you have written, you will notice this by a fast progress when updating your music library for the second time.

However, maybe we have misunderstood your question?

Best regards,
Your Silverjuke Team

[Dolce24]

When i add albums through the menu, or through drag and drop to Silverjuke, it runs all albums through in the update progress. Could it be because i don't use a ini file, and instead use the library through the windows registry...?

Hope you a have a solution for this

[Service-Team]

Dolce24 wrote:
> When i add albums through the menu, or through
> drag and drop to Silverjuke, it runs all albums
> through in the update progress [...]

That's true, and that's needed. However, as mentioned above, Silverjuke checks the date of the albums/tracks already in the database; the update for these tracks should be quite fast therefore.

Best regards,
Your Silverjuke Team

[Dolce24]

Service-Team wrote:
> Dolce24 wrote:
> > When i add albums through the menu, or through
> > drag and drop to Silverjuke, it runs all albums
> > through in the update progress
>
> That's true, and that's needed. However, as
> mentioned above, Silverjuke checks the date of
> the albums/tracks already in the database; the
> update for these tracks should be quite fast
> therefore.
>
> Best regards,
> Your Silverjuke Team

Thanks for a quick answer