Nirvana wrote: > I'd like to take the opportunity of this topic to > point out what I feel as a general behaviour > towards software and with which I do not agree. > > If the idea of criticizm is to improve, fine: > nothing is perfect and discovering bugs or > matters to be possibly enhanced is wort...

"My current idea is, to add the unique number to the tracks independently of which albums are in view. So if your music library contains 5000 tracks, you will have unique numbers with four digits: 0001, 0002, 0003, ... 0010, 0011, 0002,> ... 4999, 5000." I currently have spoken to someone ...

Service-Team wrote: > I think, we have to add the following changes to > Silverjuke: > > - Assigning a unique number to each track which is > (optionally) shown instead of the normal track > number > > - Reacting eg. to the Keys "0"-"9" and to "<" > and ">" (c...

I've been puttering around with other stuff :/ It would interface with those controls either through a keyboard hack (using a keyboard matrix), a KeyWiz, or some flavor of iPac (all can be found amongst that link of the forum I posted above) I just was refreshing some things and noticed your new "ol...

For controls, this is kinda what I was talking about: index.jpg Something with a minimal amount of controls. We have a bunch of folks who have juke projects going, and our whole purpose is to avoid having them look like there's a computer in there if at all possible, and the keyboard just takes away...

I'm a member of another forum where MANY jukebox programs are tested/refined. Here's a link to my posting of your software: http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php/topic,13403.40.html What I'm wondering, and what will make your software attractive to others looking to build a jukebox, is if the co...