> clicking the column header for the first
> critereia and add a second criteria by holding
> shift and then clicking another column header and
> so on [...]
Yes, that seems to be a good idea for me; we could also visualize the secondary sort criteria by drawing eg. a small up/down arrow in the header of these columns then.
Does anybody know if this is a "standard" also used in other programs than Outlook?
Statistics: Posted by Service-Team — 12. Jun 06, 13:35
]]>
Maybe you could also make some presets like "Artist/Year/Album" and "Rating" and so on. So you can define your own views: select the sort criteria and columns to be shown one time an then you can switch the views with one click like music selections
Statistics: Posted by Iznogood — 12. Jun 06, 10:15
]]>
> selected, but the filter is disabled (you see all
> tracks) [...]
Thanks, we have fixed this now by switching the music selection off correctly (as it was meant to be in case of tags being changed that affect the album combinations - maybe we could also keep the music selection under some circumstances, however, this would be by far more complicated).
The changes will be available in the next release these days then.
Regarding the secondary search ordering: Your idea is interesting, however, I fear, most users would not expect the sort order being changed when changing the column order.
Statistics: Posted by Service-Team — 9. Jun 06, 14:52
]]>
Statistics: Posted by admi-ral — 9. Jun 06, 08:22
]]>
After the editing, the music-selection is still selected, but the filter is disabled (you see all tracks)
Reported this one months ago but thought it had been tracked - the database-update-bug (similar) has been solved indeed
greetz, admi-ral
Statistics: Posted by admi-ral — 9. Jun 06, 08:19
]]>
mir selbst ist die Sortierung "relativ" egal, wenn es aber überhaupt nötig sein sollte auszuwählen, welche Spalte in den Sortier-Algo mit einfließen soll, *dann* würde ich sagen, dass man als erstes logischerweise die nimmt, auf die man geklickt hat, und als zweites/drittes/... von links nach rechts die spalten abarbeitet. Und dann könnte man quasi die Spalten so verschieben wie man will, dass die Sortierung passt...
Aber wie gesagt, dies ist kein Feature-Request von mir, nur eine Idee zu diesem Topic
gruß, admi-ral
Statistics: Posted by admi-ral — 9. Jun 06, 08:10
]]>
> feature that would allow me to output all low
> frequences on a specific sound card?
I understand your problem, but - apart from the point that this seems to be very special - it is close to impossible to keep two soundcards in sync from application level (as Silverjuke is).
Maybe there is a solution on the driver level of some soundcards?
It may also be possible to realize this with a special-programmed VST-plugin that outputs some frequecies to somewhere else, however, this may also result in sync problems IMHO.
Statistics: Posted by Service-Team — 8. Jun 06, 22:54
]]>
> > possible to sort by several criteria (first
> > by artist, then by album, ...)
>
> Imho the "next" criteria should be the
> one on the left side of the list, [...]
Something like a combobox for the secondary sort criteria? For the moment I'm not really sure if this is needed at all, but I'm sure (also, only at the moment
) that I do not want to waste any space on the screen for this - IMHO - very special feature.Maybe some options for this in the context menus? Any ideas how this is solved in other programs?
> the order of the item-rows can be easily edited [...]
What has this to do with the sorting?
> > For the moment, we will stop adding any new features.
>
> in this case, there is no need to (re(re))repeat
> feature-requests like an Search-Enhancement?
> well, we'll wait another 2 months
Well, you've just (re(re(re)))repeated your request - but you are right to always remember us again.
admi-ral, it is always nice to hear from you, thanks for writing,
best regards,
Your Silverjuke Team
Statistics: Posted by Service-Team — 8. Jun 06, 22:45
]]>
This would ease the cabling of my sound system, as I could have one dedicated sound card for prelistening, one dedicated sound card for normal output without bass and one dedicated sound card for the low frequencies - then, I would not need another hardware frequency-separating filter and additional cabling.
Best regards,
Markus
Statistics: Posted by GruberMa — 8. Jun 06, 21:57
]]>
Please just forget that ...
Statistics: Posted by GruberMa — 8. Jun 06, 21:53
]]>
in this case, there is no need to (re(re))repeat feature-requests like an Search-Enhancement? well, we'll wait another 2 months
Statistics: Posted by admi-ral — 8. Jun 06, 19:14
]]>
Imho the "next" criteria should be the one on the left side of the list, the order of the item-rows can be easily edited
Statistics: Posted by admi-ral — 8. Jun 06, 19:10
]]>
> FX.
For VST effects and for the built-in equalizers, they are availabe at Menu/Reset to default values:
For the other built-in effects, there is only one "reset" preset, however, there have never been much more useful ones.
BTW: Feel free to share presets here in the forums
> Within the new list view, instant search should be
> available (for example, when sorted by Artist,
> when typing "A", ABBA and AC/DC should
> appear, when typing "A" and then a
> "C", only AC/DC should appear, ...).
This happend when you put the cursor into the search input field, however, the search is done over all fields then.
> Within the new list view, it should also be
> possible to sort by several criteria (first by
> artist, then by album, ...)
Currently, the secondary sort criteria is always the album name - how would you like to see this editable?
Statistics: Posted by Service-Team — 8. Jun 06, 15:40
]]>
]]>
]]>