Thanks for the vote of confidence
(And people have already donated. For which I am very grateful. It's not that I need money or that I would stop developing these skins without donations, but someone donating money just as 'Thank You' is indeed a very flattering gesture. But then again: )
> I'm going to try the skin out when I have time. Thanks
Let me know if you find any issues (apart from some obvious not yet implemented functionality
).> P.s. is it hard to get video working for this skin? As I have many videos in my library?
I'll keep that in mind. Video has never been workable for me (not stable enough to play more than 1 or 2 videos before crashing) but I could implement and test it no problem.
Cheers,
SilverEagle
Statistics: Posted by SilverEagle — 30. Dec 11, 15:28
]]>
Statistics: Posted by srodda — 30. Dec 11, 13:47
]]>
> - The Artist view (...) breaks ups compilation albums
> ...
> Could the skin use the 'Album Artist' field instead of 'Artist' to make the groupings?
Agreed, I've put all on the short-term todo list.
SilverEagle
Statistics: Posted by SilverEagle — 21. Dec 11, 08:55
]]>
- Playback doesn't start when I add a song to the queue. I get a popup message that the song has been added to the queue, but then I have to start playback manually.
- The Artist view is definitely the reason to use this skin, but one issue is that it breaks ups compilation albums and displays each artist individually. Is there any way to solve this short of changing the artist on these albums? Could the skin use the 'Album Artist' field instead of 'Artist' to make the groupings?
Statistics: Posted by hotspur — 20. Dec 11, 14:17
]]>
Makes no differences as far as I can tell. But there is no video support either way.
Statistics: Posted by SilverEagle — 16. Dec 11, 10:33
]]>
Which version should we be running this skin with? 2.74, 3.04?
Statistics: Posted by hotspur — 15. Dec 11, 18:16
]]>
It'll take a few decades at this speed, but maybe I'll get there in the end...
For all the patient followers of this thread finally something to play with. Which is not to say it is already really usable or finished, but it works.
This skin needs the EagleTools.dll from . Also you'll have to install the free fonts in your Windows. The skin will work without them, but will probably fall back to some wrongly scaled arial.
And finally: the name is currently a placeholder. Still have to think of something relevant to the skin.
Have fun!
SilverEagle
Statistics: Posted by SilverEagle — 14. Dec 11, 14:24
]]>
]]>
Unfortunately with the slowing down of the Silverjuke community this skin lost its momentum as well. During its development I used BlueTouch V3 beta to test and further develop my EagleTools library. Then V3 beta grew into its own and is currently my only skin being 'actively developed' (well, at least 'actively supported').
However while the EagleTools library was developed it was not fully compatible with this teaser skin anymore.
But I'll see what I can do, it might not be that much work to port this skin to the current state of the library, just so it will be working again as I left it. Then I'll release it in its current state for any skinner who is interested.
SilverEagle
Statistics: Posted by SilverEagle — 14. Nov 11, 20:40
]]>
Statistics: Posted by srodda — 11. Nov 11, 11:37
]]>
]]>
How's this skin going? Can't wait to see this skin complete
Statistics: Posted by Guest — 15. Mar 10, 16:40
]]>
it`s very nice
you are great
see you
Kayyak
Statistics: Posted by Kayyak — 17. Dec 09, 14:04
]]>
> turn up in the competition but obviously didnt
I did finally solved an issue which had me stuck for a few months, but due to lack of time and skinning-energy it will probably not be finalized any time soon...
And as the essential parts of this skin are based on a DLL and not on normal scripting I would not enter it in a skinning competition.
SilverEagle
Statistics: Posted by SilverEagle — 7. Dec 09, 14:12
]]>
]]>